THE MAN WHO WAS GIVEN KNOWLEDGE BUT CHOSE TO FOLLOW HIS DESIRES

 

 

The Qur’an also tells us about an unnamed man whose story serves as a warning about what can happen when a person receives knowledge and guidance but allows his desires to overcome them. His story appears in Surah Al-A’raf, where Allah presents him as an example for people to reflect upon.

Allah says:

“And recite to them the story of the one to whom We gave Our signs, but he detached himself from them; so Satan pursued him, and he became of those who went astray.” (Qur’an 7:175)

The Qur’an does not mention this man’s name. Instead, it directs our attention to what happened to him.

According to the Qur’anic passage, this was someone who had been given access to Allah’s signs and knowledge. He was therefore not someone who simply never knew the truth. He had been given an opportunity to recognise guidance, yet he eventually turned away from it.

The next verse gives an even stronger description:

“And had We willed, We could have elevated him through them, but he inclined to the earth and followed his own desire.” (Qur’an 7:176)

This is where the story becomes particularly relevant. Knowledge itself does not automatically make a person righteous. A person may know what is correct and still choose something else. They may understand the consequences of a particular action and nevertheless follow their desires.

The phrase “inclined to the earth” conveys the idea of becoming attached to worldly desires and choosing immediate gratification over obedience to Allah. His problem was not a lack of access to guidance. His problem was what he chose to do with that guidance.

Allah then compares him to a dog, explaining that whether it is driven away or left alone, it continues to pant. The comparison illustrates the intensity of uncontrolled desire and the condition of someone who becomes consumed by what they want.

This story carries an important warning for Muslims who pursue Islamic knowledge. Learning more about Islam is valuable, but knowledge must produce action. Knowing the ruling on something while deliberately ignoring it does not benefit a person in the same way that knowledge combined with obedience does.

It also reminds us not to become overly confident simply because we have acquired knowledge. A person can attend lectures, read books, memorise Qur’an and hadith, and discuss Islamic subjects intelligently, yet still struggle with sincerity, humility, and obedience.

That is why the Qur’an repeatedly connects knowledge with fear of Allah, action, and righteousness.

There is also a lesson about the danger of following desires. Desires themselves are part of human nature, but Islam teaches believers to control them rather than allow them to become their guide. When desires begin to determine our decisions without regard for Allah’s commands, they can gradually pull a person away from the very guidance they once understood.

The identity of this man is therefore less important than the warning his story carries. Allah did not preserve his name for us because we are not meant to become fascinated with who he was. We are meant to examine ourselves.

Do we act upon what we know?

Do we allow our desires to override what we know is right?

Are we becoming closer to Allah as our knowledge increases?

The Qur’an’s decision to leave this man unnamed makes the lesson even more universal. He could have been a scholar, a knowledgeable worshipper, or simply someone who had been given clear signs from Allah. What matters is that knowledge without sincere obedience can become a test rather than an advantage.

His story reminds us that Islamic knowledge should not merely increase what we know. It should improve who we are.